Sigh ... Why ?
Apr. 26th, 2007 11:00 amOk, I've noticed all the daemon meme's popping up from some site called The Golden Compass.
Once again - why are they renaming the film ? Its the Harry Potter thing all over again - And again in the UK its called the Northern Lights.
I mean why ?
Once again - why are they renaming the film ? Its the Harry Potter thing all over again - And again in the UK its called the Northern Lights.
I mean why ?
(no subject)
Date: 2007-04-26 10:11 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-04-26 10:35 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-04-26 10:38 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-04-26 10:55 am (UTC)and "Shiny Twirly Thing" just doesn't work as a film title ;-)
(no subject)
Date: 2007-04-26 11:12 am (UTC)And for once I'm going to side with the American model on this, because in a series where the other two books are called "The Subtle Knife" and "The Amber Spyglass," as a title "The Golden Compass" fits far better than "Northern Lights" - it uses the same structure, and it's an item of some kind. The title has symmetry. Maybe that's just another sign of American cultural imperialism, but if Pullman agreed, it's just as much of a correct title as anything else.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-04-26 11:43 am (UTC)But my point sort of is the American Publishers just didn't want to call the book the Northern Lights (Pullman did argue - but bottom line was he wanted it published) ...
I never understood the point in changing Philsophers Stone either.
Its not so much the renaming of the film I don't get as the renaming in the first place ...
(no subject)
Date: 2007-04-26 03:12 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-04-27 07:23 am (UTC)I've always understood the Harry Potter change was simply not wanting to offend Middle America - although you'd think "sorceror" would cause just as much offence!