gaspode: (Default)
[personal profile] gaspode
OK ...

I'm relativly pro police however this is stupid

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/05/20/city_london_scientology_protest_summons/

Basically they are saying calling Scientology a cult is distressing to people in it ???

WTF ???

(no subject)

Date: 2008-05-21 09:29 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] miss-s-b.livejournal.com
I'm waiting for the judge in that case from 1984 to be arrested. He called it a DANGEROUS cult.

Honestly, really, it's just that the police like to tell people what to do, and will use whatever law they can think of at the time to justify it. What a bunch of cults.

(no subject)

Date: 2008-05-21 09:49 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] steverogerson.livejournal.com
But it is a cult.

(no subject)

Date: 2008-05-21 09:50 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] luckykaa.livejournal.com
Wish people would stop saying it was for using the word "cult". It's for the equally stupid reason of saying it's not a religion but a dangerous cult. I'm a stickler for accuracy.

It's a stupid charge, and I'm sure the Crown Prosecution service are going to drop it before it gets anywhere. It's clearly reasonable behaviour, and also clearly free speech covered under the Human Rights Act.

(no subject)

Date: 2008-05-21 10:14 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] gaspodex.livejournal.com
Nope. The complaints recieved (as reported) were for use of the word cult (in several forms nt just this one - this is one person who refused to lower the placard) and also the phrase 'scientology kills' (a different set of complaints). There was no use of the word dangerous in the complaint in this context.

Also sadly, we do not have full freedom of speech in the UK (rightly or wrongly - different debate) - the one sane thing about the US constitution is the first amendment.

(no subject)

Date: 2008-05-21 11:19 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] luckykaa.livejournal.com
Well, fair enough, but if he is actually charged, it will not just be because of the use of the word "cult".

We don't have the level of freedom of speech that the American do, but fortunately there is precedent. The Human Rights Act has been successfully applied in cases where the defendant argued that his behaviour was reasonable.

(no subject)

Date: 2008-05-21 10:11 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] davidbrider.livejournal.com
In fairness, "Cult" is rather a loaded term, and often used rather loosely to apply to any slightly eccentric group whose beliefs the writer doesn't agree with. I tend to prefer the term "New Religious Movement" (although as I'm not exactly a big fan of using the word "religious" to describe my own beliefs, that's not exactly problem-free...).

But I'm not sure using the word "cult" should be worthy of a court summons...

(no subject)

Date: 2008-05-21 10:15 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] gaspodex.livejournal.com
Its not THAT loaded. Of course it's used to describe fans of genre tv all the time ;-)

(no subject)

Date: 2008-05-21 03:45 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] elenopa.livejournal.com
And we're very dangerous....

(no subject)

Date: 2008-05-21 12:53 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kiwi-dan.livejournal.com
WTF ....haven't the police got better things to do?

Profile

gaspode: (Default)
Gaspode

April 2017

S M T W T F S
      1
2345678
9101112 131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
30      

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags